Geologic Maps & Structural Geology

Back to the Course Homepage


Slides

In this chapter the slides sets are more important than they usually are:

 

Things to keep in mind

For fun - some historic aspects of maps

Maps are just neat, so enjoy this 1887 geologic map. Try to zoom in to see the rock units that are labeled and their estimated ages. An 1861 geologic map of Friuli, Italy. Also, and early geologic map in Ireland.

This is just a fun image to see how topographic maps were historically inked by hand: USGS on Twitter: "Just another day on the job (in 1952) - Inking contours on a topographic map

An informative history: how did the mountains form, anyway?

Please read this article, which gives an interesting historical account of ideas related to mountain building prior to Plate Tectonics. It's a fairly long read, but non-technical. Keep in mind the difference between classifying things vs. having a predictive model for how processes happen. An analogy might be classifying the wide variety of birds by color, wing shape, etc., vs. understanding the evolutionary processes that led to the observed diversity. What does plate tectonics predict about mountains (and other geologic processes)? More on this in CH 19.

Visualization: a classic "plunging" anticline

This is Sheep Mountain Anticline in Wyoming.

Sheep Mountain anticline (Wyoming)

Note all the colors in the various sedimentary beds! Beautiful. An even more colorful photo (I don't know if the photographer has enhanced anything or not, but it does at least show the division between distinct sedimentary layers.)

Here is a gigpan of the Sheep Mountain Anticline (high resolution imagery you can scroll through). Very cool.

Here is a recent paper on the details of the Sheep Mountain anticline. Just take a look at Page 4, there are some neat pictures delineating some of the sedimentary formation names.

Finally, here you can read about the incredible variety of fossils found in this part of Wyoming.

A good question to ask yourself is "do I understand how a plunging anticline is formed?"

A video tour of the San Andreas Fault in the San Francisco Bay Area

Fault Images

What type of fault is this? (Normal, Reverse, Right-lateral strike-slip RLSS, Left-lateral strike-slip LLSS)

fault

What type of fault is this? (Normal, Reverse, Right-lateral strike-slip RLSS, Left-lateral strike-slip LLSS)

fault

The San Andreas Fault (SAF)

Extent of SAF

The San Andreas Fault is ~ 1,300 km long extending through most of California. In the south it meets a spreading center in the Gulf of California, and then meets the Pacific and Juan de Fuca plates just offshore in northern part of the state. The image below indicates the locations of various cities relative to the fault, the two largest known historic earthquakes, and some more recent events along the San Andrea Fault. Of course, earthquakes occur in other parts of the state, too.

saf-extent

SAF in the Carrizo Plain Area

The San Andreas Fault is perhaps best exposed near us, in the Carrizo Plain National Monument - only about a 90 minute drive from campus. Wallace Creek is probably the most famous site along the whole fault. Here are some resources:

SAF Lidar File

Load into Google Earth -- FUN!!! amazing detail (compare with/without) SAF Carrizo Plain area Lidar File

SAF GPS data in central California

I gave you this handout in class; here it is as an image:

saf-gps

and as a file: SAF GPS data in central California

Regional Fault Systems

The Los Angeles Basin has a complex set of faults (and this image is simplified!!!)

labasin

Subduction Zones are Faults

Subduction zones are reverse faults. Subduction zones represent the largest faults (think surface area of the fault plane surface) and therefore can host the largest earthquakes.

fault

source

 

fault

source

You can now imagine that the Pacific Northwest region of the United States has a larger maximal earthquake magnitude potential (seismic hazard) than even the San Andreas Fault:

fault

source